Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUlucakar, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorCaglar, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-23T10:25:14Z
dc.date.available2019-12-23T10:25:14Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1304-7310
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.513504
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/21342
dc.description.abstractThis article analyzes Turkish civil-military relations with the help of two different models of civil-military relations (separation and concordance) in order to bring a new perspective to the analysis of civil-military relations. The article begins with a short review of the theoretical framework of the separation and concordance models, followed by a brief history of four Military interventions that occurred in Turkey in 1960, 1971, 1980, and 1997. The article will then analyze Turkish civil-military relations through the separation and concordance models in an attempt to decide which model would be more appropriate to explain the Turkish case. It reaches the conclusion that the concordance model is more appropriate than the separation model to serve that purpose. However, the concordance model has some methodological weaknesses, requiring modification in order to properly analyze the case of Turkey.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUluslararasi Iliskiler Konseyi Dernegi
dc.relation.isversionof10.33458/uidergisi.513504
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectInternational Relations
dc.titleAn Analysis Of Two Different Models Of Civil-Military Relations: The Case Of Turkey
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.relation.journalUluslararasi Iliskiler-International Relations
dc.contributor.departmentSiyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.issue55
dc.identifier.startpage41
dc.identifier.endpage57
dc.indexingWoS


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record