Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorÖktem, Mustafa Kemal
dc.contributor.authorBekolo Ebolo, Emmanuel
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-03T07:19:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-21
dc.date.submitted2019-12-25
dc.identifier.citationBooks Arber, S. (2006). Secondary analysis of survey data. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (2nd Ed.). London: Sage. Antwi-Boasiako, K. B., & Csanyi, P. (2014). The theories of decentralization and local government: Implementation, implications, and realities: a global perspective. Nacogdoches, Texas: Stephen F. Austin State University Press. Agence française de développement, Bayraktar, U. S., & Massicard, E. (2011). La décentralisation en Turquie. Paris: AFD, Agence française de développement. Babbie, E. (2007). The practice of social research (11th Ed.) Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing. Babbie, E. 2005. The Basics of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth, p.336. Bakır, C., & In Ertan, G. (2019). Policy analysis in Turkey. Bernard, H.R. (2011) “Research Methods in Anthropology” 5th edition, AltaMira Press, p.7 Berg, B. L. 2004. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston: Pearson, Education Inc. Boyatzis, R. E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Boadway, R., & Shah, A. (2009). Fiscal Federalism: Principles and Practice of Multi-Order Governance. Leiden: Cambridge University Press. Caiden, G. E. (2017). Administrative reform. London: Routledge. Capuno, Joseph J. 2005. The quality of local governance and development under decentralization in the Philippines. Quezon: School of Economics, Univ. of the Philippines. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/46627. Commission of the European Communities. (2000). Towards a European research area: Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. ÇUKURÇAYIR, A. (2006), Siyasal Katılma ve Yerel Demokrasi, Çizgi Yayınevi, İstanbul. Dahl, R. A. (1969). Pluralist Democracy in the United States: Conflict and Consent. Chicago: Rand Mac Nably and Company. Denzin, N. K. 1978. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill. DİNÇER, Ömer ve Cevdet Yılmaz (2003), Kamu Yönetiminde Yeniden Yapılanma: 1 Değişimin Yönetimi İçin Yönetimde Değişim, T.C Başbakanlık, Ekim, Ankara. Drucker, P. F. (2016). Managing in a time of great change. Eryılmaz, Bilal (2006), Kamu Yönetimi, Erkam Matbaası, İstanbul. BOOK European Commission. (2016). Supporting decentralization, local governance and local development through a territorial approach. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Global Forum on Reinventing Government Building Trust in Government, United Nations., & IASIA. (2007). Excellence and leadership in the public sector: The role of education and training : 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government Building Trust in Government, 26-29 June 2007, Vienna, Austria. New York: United Nations. Görmez, K. (1997). Yerel Demokrasi ve Türkiye : Yerel Yönetim ve Belediyeler. Vadi Yayınları. Ankara. Güler, B. A. (2006). Yerel Yönetimler – Liberal Açıklamalara Eleştirel Yaklaşım (3. bs.). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi. Gurr, T. R., & King, D. S. (1987). The State and the city. Houndmills: Macmillan Education. Handy, C. (2007). Understanding Organizations. Hakim, C. (2000). Research design: Successful designs for social and economic research (2nd Ed.). London: Routledge. Hasan Y. (2009). Türkiye'de belediyelerin yeniden yapılandırılması : Kırıkkale Belediyesi Yayınları. Hesse, J.J. and Sharpe, L.J. 1991. “Local government in international perspective: some comparative observations”. In Local government and urban affairs in international perspective, Edited by: Hesse, J.J. 603–621. Bade-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. John, P., & SAGE. (2010). Local governance in Western Europe. London: SAGE Publications. In Bras, J.-P., & In Signoles, A. (2017). Ètats et territoires du politique: Dossier & varia. In Yang, K., & In Miller, G. (2008). Handbook of research methods in public administration. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Kapucu, N., & Palabıyık, H. (2008). Turkish public administration: From tradition to the modern age. Ankara: International Strategic Research Organization. KAMTO, M. (1990). Le territoire du Cameroun et le droit international. Dans La maîtrise du sol, Paris, Economica, p. 91. Keleş, Yerinden Yönetim ve Siyaset, 2012. Cem Yayınevi. Keleş, R. (2016). Yerinden yönetim ve siyaset. İstanbul: Cem Yayınevi. Kersting, N., & Vetter, A. (2003). Reforming local government in Europe: Closing the gap between democracy and efficiency. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Kom, T. B., Sadi, R. E., & Cameroon. (2013). Cameroun: La décentralisation en marche. Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2019). Introduction to comparative public administration: Administrative systems and reforms in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Lewis, J. (2006). Design issues. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage. Lincoln, Y. S. and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Berverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; and Cook, T. D. and Donald T. Campbell. 1979. Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago, Ill: Rand McNally College Publishing Company. Lind, N. S., Jones, L. R., & Otenyo, E. E. (2009). Comparative public administration: The essential readings. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Maddick, H. (1963). Democracy decentralisation and the development. Bombay [ecc.: Asia Publ. House. Miles, M. B. and Michael, A. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, p. 56. Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2011). The impact of fiscal decentralization: Issues in theory and challenges in practice. Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank. MDP-ESA Working Document 1991. Mendelsohn, M. (2003). Referendum democracy: Citizens, elites and deliberation in referendum campaigns. Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave. MVENG, E. (1963). Histoire du Cameroun. Paris, Présence africaine, p. 495. Ngongo, L. (1982). Histoire des forces religieuses au Cameroun: De la Première Guerre mondiale à l'indépendance (1916-1955). Paris: Editions Karthala. Neuman, W.L. (2000) Social research methods qualitative and quantitative approaches. 4th Edition, Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights. Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods qualitative and quantitavie approach (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson. Norton, A. (1997). International handbook of local and regional government: A comparative analysis of advanced democracies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. OECD (2019), Making Decentralisation Work: A Handbook for Policy-Makers, OECD Multi-level Governance Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/g2g9faa7-en. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1997). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley. Owojaiye, G. S. (1981). Comparative public administration: The dynamics of local administrative reform in Britain and Nigeria. University of Bath. Page, E. (1991). Localism and centralism in Europe: The political and legal bases of local self-government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd edition. Sage Publications, Inc. Pajollari, E. (2017). Central - Local Government Relations and Decentralization in Albania. Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2012). Handbook of local and regional development. London [England: Routledge. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis - new public management, governance, and the neo-weberian state. Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (2000). The logic of comparative social inquiry. Malabar, Fla: Krieger. Ragin, C. C., & Amoroso, L. M. (2019). Constructing social research: The unity and diversity of method. 2019 Report World Observatory on Subnational Government Finance and Investment: Key Findings. Sahni, P., & Vayunandan, E. (2010). Administrative theory. Sills, D. L. (1972). International encyclopaedia of the social sciences. New York: Macmillan Co. SNGWOFI 2019 report country profiles. TBMM (2003), 59. Hükümet programı Erdoğan hükümeti, Grand National Assembly of Turkey, Ankara. TBB & Mustapha Kemal Üniversitesi (2013). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Yerel Yönetimler ve Kentsel Politikalar: IV. Kamu Yönetimi Sempozyumu bildiriler kitabı. Ankara : Pegem Akademi. Trochim, W. M. K. 2005. Research Methods: The Concise Knowledge Base. Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog Publishing, p. 128. UN. ESCAP. Secretariat. (2006). Confronting poverty reduction in Asia and the Pacific: Note. Bangkok: UN. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2009). International guidelines on decentralisation and access to basic services for all. Nairobi: The programme. United Nations., & Global Forum on Reinventing Government. (2007). Public administration and democratic governance: Governments serving citizens. New York: United Nations. Vivre Ensemble (Guichard Report) (1976), La Documentation Française, Paris. Wilson, W., Barnes, A., & Wilson, W. (1924). Woodrow Wilson's letter to Almont Barnes: Together with the article under discussion "The Study of Administration" from the Political Science Quarterly of June, 1887. Place of publication not identified: publisher not identified. Wollmann, H. (2014). Introduction to comparative public administration: Administrative systems and reform in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Yayman, Hüseyin. (2008). Türkiye’nin İdari Reform Tarihi. Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi Yin, R.K. (2004). Case study research designs and methods: Applied social research methods (3rd Ed.). London: Sage. Books’ Chapters In Demirkaya, Y. (2016). New public management in Turkey: Local government reform. Keleş, R. (2016). THE NORMATIVE BASE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT: PROGRESS IN LOCAL DEMOCRACY AND THE REFORMATION PROCESS. In Sadioglu, U., In Dede, K., & IGI Global,. (2016). Theoretical foundations and discussions on the reformation process in local governments İn Sadioglu, U., In Dede, K., & IGI Global,. (2016). Comparative studies and regionally-focused cases examining local governments, PREFACE Montero, A. P. & Samuels, D. J. (2004) The political determinants of decentralization in Latin America: Causes and consequences, In: Monteroy, A. P. & Samuels, D. J. (eds.) Decentralization and Democracy in Latin America (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 1-39 Öktem K., & Çiftçi L. (2016) Vision of public administration reform in Turkey. In: Demirkaya Y (ed.) New Public Management in Turkey: Local Government Reform. New York: Routledge, pp. 79–121. Panara C. (2016). CONCEPT AND ROLE OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT IN THE CONTEMPORARY STATE. In Sadioglu, U., & Dede, K. (2016). Theoretical foundations and discussions on the reformation process in local governments. Pilet, J.-B. Et al (2009): The quasi-presidentialism of local political systems, in : Reynaert, H. et al (eds.): Local Political Leadership in Europe. Town Chief, City Boss or Loco President? Brugge, 397-406 Pleschberger, W. (January 01, 2016). Democratic Preferences of the Indirectly-Elected Mayor, Open or Locked-In: A Contribution to the “Difference Hypothesis”. 110-139. Rüşen K. and Güner A. (2016). A Comparative Study of Local Governments in the Constitutions of Selected EU Countries and Turkey. In Sadioglu, Ugur, and Kadir Dede. 2016. Comparative studies and regionally-focused cases examining local governments. http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-5225-0320-0 SADIOGLU, U. and DEDE, K. (2016). “Current Discussions on the Question: Remarks of Local Government’s Reform through Comparative Perspective”. In SADIOGLU, U. and DEDE, K. (Eds.). Theoretical Foundations and Discussions on the Reformation Process in Local Governments, IGI Global Publishing, Hershey, Pennsylvania (USA), pp.1-23. Wolman, H. (January 01, 1996). Theories of Local Democracy in the United States. 158-173. Journal Articles Acar, M. (2016). Revisiting Local Democracy in Turkey. African, Y. I. L. O. A. A. O. E. (August 08, 2016). African Charter on the Values and Principles of Decentralisation, Local Governance and Local Development. African Yearbook of International Law Online / Annuaire Africain De Droit International Online, 21, 1, 371-387. Arnstein, S. (1969), ‘A Ladder of Citizen Participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224. Asatryan, Z., De, W. K., & De, W. K. (September 01, 2015). Direct democracy and local government efficiency. European Journal of Political Economy, 39, 58-66. Beer-Tóth, K. (2009). Local financial autonomy in theory and practice: The impact of fiscal decentralisation in Hungary. Freiburg/Schweiz: Univ. Bennett, C. J. (January 01, 1991). What is policy convergence and what causes it?. British Journal of Political Science, 1991, 215-233. Bergh, S. I. (January 01, 2012). Introduction: Researching the effects of neoliberal reforms on local governance in the Southern Mediterranean. Mediterranean Politics, 17, 3, 303-321. Boex, J. & Yilmaz, S. (December 2010). An Analytical Framework for Assessing Decentralized Local Governance and the Local Public Sector. Urban Institute Center on International Development and Governance. Boex, J. (2011), Exploring the Measurement and Effectiveness of the Local Public Sector: Toward a classification of local public sector finances and a comparison of devolved and deconcentrated finances. Bryden, J. M. (January 01, 2010). Local development. Human Economy : a Citizen's Guide, 248-260. Caiden, G. (1968). “Administrative Reform,” International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 347-354. Clark, G. L. (1984) A theory of local autonomy, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(2), pp. 195-208. Cobban, A. (1946). THE NAPOLEONIC SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION IN FRANCE. Wiley Online Library Coşkun Can Aktan, Globalleşme, Bölgeselleşme Ve Yerelleşme, Dış Ticaret Dergisi, Sayı: 10, 1-4, (1998) Curristine, T., Lonti, Z., & Joumard, I. (2007). Improving Public Sector Efficiency: Challenges and Opportunities. (OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7, 1, 1-41.) Paris: OECD Publishing. Davey K.J. (1971). Local Autonomy and Independent Revenues. Wiley Online Library. Gaebler, S., & Roesel, F. (December 01, 2019). Do direct elections matter? Quasi-experimental evidence from Germany. International Tax and Public Finance, 26, 6, 1416-1445. Goel, R. K., Ram, R., Mazhar, U., & Nelson, M. A. (April 01, 2017). Different forms of decentralization and their impact on government performance: Micro-level evidence from 113 countries. Economic Modelling, 62, 171-183. Gow, J. I. (2012). “Administrative Reform,” in L. Côté and J.-F. Savard (eds.), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Public Administration, [online], www.dictionnaire.enap.ca Grossi, G., Marcou, G., & Reichard, C. (January 01, 2010). Comparative aspects of institutional variants for local public service provision. Provision of Public Services in Europe : between State, Local Government and Market, 217-239. Gül, H., Kamalak, I., & Kiriş, H. M. (January 01, 2016). Local and Urban Administrations, Politics, and Elections in Turkey. 182-206. Güney, A., & Çelenk, A. A. (January 01, 2010). Europeanization and the dilemma of decentralization: Centre-local relations in Turkey. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 12, 3.). Hewitt, W. E. (January 01, 2004). Improving citizen participation in local government in Latin America through international cooperation: A case study. Development in Practice : an Oxfam Journal, 14, 5, 619-632. Hope, K. R. (2001). "The new public management: context and practice in Africa." International Public Management Journal 4(2): 119-134. Hutchcroft, P. D. (January 01, 2001). Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power. Governance Oxford-, 14, 23-54. Ivanyna, M., & Shah, A. (2014). How close is your government to its people?: Worldwide indicators on localization and decentralization. Kiel: Kiel Inst. for the World Economy. Jamie Boex and Serdar Yilmaz (2010). An Analytical Framework for Assessing Decentralized Local Governance and the Local Public Sector. Urban Institute Center on International Development and Governance. Jean-Philippe Bras, & Aude Signoles. (January 01, 2017). Introduction: States and Political Territories, The Debate over Decentralization. L’année Du Maghreb, 16, 9-25. Jütting, J., Kauffmann, C., McDonnell, I., Osterrieder, H., Pinaud, N., & Wegner, L. (2004). Decentralisation and poverty in developing countries: Exploring the impact. Working Paper No. 236. Paris: OECD. Jütting, J., Corsi, E., Kauffmann, C., Mcdonnell, I., Osterrieder, H., Pinaud, N., & Wegner, L. (December 01, 2005). What Makes Decentralisation in Developing Countries Pro-poor?. The European Journal of Development Research, 17, 4, 626-648. Kadirbeyoğlu, Z., & Sümer, B. (November 01, 2012). The Neoliberal Transformation of Local Government in Turkey and the Contracting Out of Municipal Services: Implications for Public Accountability. Mediterranean Politics, 17, 3, 340-357. Kalimullah, N. A., K. Ashraf, et al. (2012). "New public management: Emergence and principles." Bup Journal 1(1): 1-22. Kofele-Kale, N. (January 01, 2011). Local Governance Under Cameroon's Decentralisation Regime: Is It Sound and Fury Signifying Nothing?. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 37, 3, 513-530. Keuffer, N. (October 27, 2017). L'autonomie locale, un concept multidimensionnel: Comment le définir, comment le mesurer et comment créer un indice d'autonomie locale comparatif?. Revue Internationale De Politique Comparee, 23, 4, 443-490. Köşe, Ömer. (2004). Yerel yönetim olgusu ve küreselleşme sürecindeki yükselişi. Sayıştay. Lidstrom, A. (January 01, 1998). The comparative study of local government systems-a research agenda. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 1, 1, 97-115. Magre, J., & Bertrana, X. (April 01, 2007). Exploring the limits of institutional change: The direct election of mayors in Western Europe. Local Government Studies, 33, 2, 181-194. Marques, R. C., Kortt, M. A., & Dollery, B. (June 01, 2015). Determining the optimal size of local government : the case of Tasmanian councils. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74, 2, 212-226. Matei, L., & Chesaru, O. M. (August 01, 2014). Implementation Guidelines of the New Public Management. Cases of Romania and Sweden. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 857-861. Michels, A., & De, G. L. (January 01, 2010). Examining Citizen Participation: Local Participatory Policy Making and Democracy. Local Government Studies, 36, 4, 477-491. Montgomery,J.D.(1969). "Sources of Bureaucratic Reform: Typology of Purpose and Politics", in Braibanti,R.(ed.), Political and Administrative Development (Durham, Duke University Press),pp.427-71. Nkot, P. F. (January 01, 1999). Le référendum du 20 mai 1972 au Cameroun : analyse de quelques tendances de la doctrine. Les Cahiers De Droit, 40, 3, 665-690. Ostrom, V. (January 01, 1976). Public choice theory: A new approach to institutional economics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Öktem, M. K. (January 01, 2014). Problems and challenges in the transition toward local governance in Turkey. Lex Localis, 4, 750-774. Page, E. C. & Goldsmith, M. (1985) Centralisation and decentralisation: a framework for comparative analysis, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 3(2), pp. 175-185. Page, E. C. & Goldsmith, M. (1987) Central and Local Government Relations: A Comparative Analysis of Western European Unitary States (London: SAGE Publications, Inc.). Polatoglu, A. (January 01, 2000). Turkish local government: The need for reform. Middle Eastern Studies, 36, 4, 156-171. Pratchett, Lawrence. (n.d.). Local autonomy, local democracy and the 'New localism'. Pratchett, L.p. (2004) Local Autonomy, Local Democracy and the 'new Localism'. Political Studies, 52(2), Pp. 358-375. Promberger, K., & Rauskala, I. (2003). New public management: An introduction from the UK perspective. Innsbruck: Univ. Innsbruck, Zentrum f. Verwaltungsmanagement. Riggs, F. W. (January 01, 2002). Globalization, ethnic diversity, and nationalism: The challenge for democracies. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 35-47. Rondinelli, et al. (1981). "Government Decentralization in Comparative Perspective: Developing Countries", International Review of Administrative Science, 47(2). Röth, L., Kaiser, A., Varol, Ç. and Sadioğlu, U. (2016), “Centre-Periphery Conflict and Ideological Distance in Turkey”, Swiss Political Science Review, 22(4), 585-607. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12225 Santos Curto, H. and Á. Dias (2014). "Administrative reforms and performance of local public policies. " International Journal of Public Sector Management 27(6): 462-474. Saunders, P. (March 01, 1982). Why study central‐local relations? Local Government Studies, 8, 2, 55-66. Schneider, A. (January 01, 2003). Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development (scid), 38, 3, 32-56. Stigler, G. J. (January 01, 1998). The Tenable Range of Functions of Local Government. International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, 88, 3-9. Süleyman Sözen (2012). Recent Administrative Reform in Turkey: A Preliminary Assessment. International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 9; May 2012. Swianiewicz, P. (2014) An empirical typology of local government systems in Eastern Europe, Local Government Studies, 40(2), pp. 292-311. Tan, E. (January 01, 2018). Quo vadis? The local government in Turkey after public management reforms. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Van de Walle, S.G.J. (Steven), & Hammerschmid, G. (Gerhard). (2011). Coordinating for Cohesion in the Public Sector of the Future: COCOPS Project Background Paper (Working Paper 1). Wollmann, H. (2000) Local government systems: from historic divergence towards convergence? Great Britain, France, and Germany as comparative cases in point, Environment and Planning C: Government and policy, 18(1), pp. 33-55. Yilmaz, S., & Guner, A. (January 01, 2013). LOCAL GOVERNMENT DISCRETION AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN TURKEY. Public Administration and Development : a Journal of the Royal Institute of Public Administration, 33, 2, 125-142. Yoo, J. W. (1994) The politics of local self-government, Korean Public Administration Review, 28(2), pp. 499-524. Yoo, J. (July 30, 2018). Assessing Central-Local Government Relations in Contemporary South Korea: An Application of Page & Goldsmith’s Comparative Framework. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 16, 3, 505-528. Ylvisaker, Paul (1983), ‘Some Criteria for a “proper” areal division of powers’, Area and Power A. Maass (ed.), The Free Press, Glencoe III. Zaharia, P. (2012). "Introduction of the New Public Management in the Romanian and Swiss Local Public Administration." Economic Insights-Trends & Challenges 64(4). Written Press and Electronic Resources https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-bristol-31857032 retrieved on December 20, 2019. Menkoue, P. (12 juillet 2015. ).12 Juillet 1884 : le Cameroun devient officiellement un protectorat allemand. Daily Retro CMR. Lien : http://lc.cx/ZYvW Meyomesse, E (9 avril 2008). Une nouvelle constitution pour le Cameroun et par les camerounais. Cameroun mon pays. Link: http://lc.cx/ZgCd http://www.icla.up.ac.za/images/country_reports/cameroon_country_report.pdf, retrieved on September 17, 2019. OSCE Mission in Kososvo’s Newletter (5 april 2005). “Local Government reform and Decentralization”. https://www.senat.fr/evenement/archives/D18/1848.html http://www.tbb.gov.tr/belediyelerimiz/istatistikler/genel-istatistikler/ Retrieved on June 30, 2019. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/democratic-governance-and-peacebuilding/responsive-and-accountable-institutions/local-governance-and-local-development/ retrieved on 3rd November 2019.tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/21986
dc.description.abstractThis thesis presents a comparative assessment of the implementation of decentralization and local government reforms over the period 2004-2019 in two unitary countries influenced by the Napoleonic model of administrative system. The focus is on the degree of the government closeness to the people manifested in Turkey and Cameroon. Building on the line of comparison suggested by Ivanyna and Shah (2014) further continued with a far more comprehensive framework, seven main variables were assessed: the structure of local government; average size of local government; the weight of local authorities in the multi-level governance; the security of existence of local authorities; the empowerment of local governments in the political, administrative and fiscal dimensions. The study used both secondary data and primary data. The primary data were generated from semi-structured interviews conducted with thirty-three informants from twenty-seven municipalities in different cities of the two countries. The results have revealed a convergence in terms of the presence of sectoral drawbacks preventing the achievement of the highest possible closeness to people. These drawbacks are essentially the continued manifestation of administrative centralization through, among others, a low fiscal decentralization making local governments highly dependent on central government transfers, and a weak participation of citizens in the management of local affairs. However, in each of the variables comparatively assessed, there are also noticeable differences between the two countries putting Turkey in a better situation than Cameroon. Based on these findings, the study concludes with recommendations for the improvement of decentralization outcomes in either country.tr_TR
dc.language.isoengtr_TR
dc.publisherSosyal Bilimler Enstitüsütr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesstr_TR
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectDecentralizationtr_TR
dc.subjectLocal Governments
dc.subjectReform Implementation
dc.subjectGovernment Closeness to the People
dc.subjectComparative Assessment
dc.subjectCameroon
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.titleThe Implementation of Decentralization and Local Government Reforms in Turkey and Cameroon : A Comparative Assessmenttr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesistr_TR
dc.description.ozetBu tez Türkiye ve Kamerun'da adem-i merkeziyet ve yerel yönetimler reformu uygulanmasının karşılaştırmalı bir değerlendirmesini sunmaktadır. Tez, hükümetin karar verme sürecini halka daha yakın hale getiren adem-i merkeziyetçiliğin başarı derecesine odaklanmaktadır. Bu sessiz sakin devrimin üzerinden yıllar geçmesine rağmen, elde edilen sonuçları kapsamlı bir şekilde değerlendiren karşılaştırmalı çalışmalar oldukça azdır. Ivanyna ve Shah (2014) tarafından karşılaştırmalı ölçüm için geliştirilen çerçeve zenginleştirilerek yedi ana boyutta değerlendirilmiştir: yerel yönetimin yapısı; ortalama yerel yönetim büyüklüğü (nüfus ve alan bakımından); yerel yönetimlerin çok düzeyli yönetişim sistemindeki ağırlığı; yerel makamların varlığının korunması; yerel yönetimlerin güçlendirilmesi. Çalışmada hem ikincil veriler hem de iki ülkenin farklı illerinde bulunan yirmi yedi belediyede çalışan otuz üç katılımcı ile yapılan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmelerden elde edilen birincil veriler kullanılmıştır. Bu karşılaştırmalı değerlendirmenin sonuçları sektörel darboğazların istenilen yüksek seviyede adem-i merkeziyetçilik ve hükümetin halka yakınlığını önlediği yönünde bir eğilimin varlığını ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bu darboğazlar Türkiye ve Kamerun’daki uzun ve güçlü merkezi idare geleneğinin -yerel yönetimleri merkezi hükümet transferlerine büyük ölçüde bağımlı hale getiren düşük mali özerklik, yerel yönetimlere vatandaşların zayıf katılımı- kalıcı etkisidir. Bununla birlikte hükümetin halka olan yakınlığı ve yerel kalkınma açılarından iki ülke arasında Türkiyeyi öne çıkaran kaydadeğer farklılıklar vardır.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentSiyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimitr_TR
dc.embargo.terms6 aytr_TR
dc.embargo.lift2020-08-07T07:19:01Z
dc.fundingYoktr_TR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess