• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi
  • İşletme Bölümü
  • İşletme Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi
  • İşletme Bölümü
  • İşletme Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Kurumsal Kaynak Planlama Yazılımı Seçimi İçin Analitik Hiyerarşik Proses ve Aprıorı Algoritması Uygulanması

View/Open
Bal, Bensu Melis-YENİ.pdf (3.527Mb)
Date
2020
Author
Bal, Bensu Melis
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item record
Abstract
Under increasing competitive conditions. The support of Enterprise Resource Planning systems (ERP) to companies is very important. With the development of technology, the number of ERP systems with different features and suppliers has increased. This situation made it difficult for companies to choose the most suitable option, but also increased the competition of software suppliers. The aim of this study is to draw attention to the importance of ERP systems and to determine the criteria that are effective in the selection of KKP and to investigate the relationship between these criteria and the firm's characteristics. For this reason, the features of ERP systems, selection criteria and similar studies in the literature were examined. Data for ERP selection process from different companies were collected and analyzed. The importance order of the selection criteria was found by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Then, the Association Rules Analysis was applied to analyze the relationship between selection criteria and firm characteristics. As a result of AHS, the top five criteria were found to be functionality, cost, ease of use, consultant features and technical infrastructure, respectively. Before analyzing the association rules, two different methods were used to determine whether these five criteria were important for the company. Although there are such different rules in two methods, similar rules are obtained. Firms that have been operating in the production sector for more than 26 years do not pay attention to cost criteria in either method, while firms that have been operating for 20-26 years do not pay attention to the advisor characteristics. For firms in the software industry, while both methods are an advisory criterion, technical infrastructure is an important criterion. When we look at the relationship of selection criteria with each other, the first method is that companies that attach importance to consultancy features do not care about cost. The second method is for a positive relationship between software parameters and technical infrastructure, for consultant features and usage.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11655/22446
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.Collections
  • İşletme Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu [194]
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Açık Erişim Birimi
Beytepe Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 297 6585-117 || Sağlık Bilimleri Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 305 1067
Bizi Takip Edebilirsiniz: Facebook | Twitter | Youtube | Instagram
Web sayfası:www.library.hacettepe.edu.tr | E-posta:openaccess@hacettepe.edu.tr
Sayfanın çıktısını almak için lütfen tıklayınız.
Contact Us | Send Feedback



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


DSpace@Hacettepe
huk openaire onayı
by OpenAIRE

About HUAES
Open Access PolicyGuidesSubcriptionsContact

livechat

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsIndexing SourceFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsIndexing SourceFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtype

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV