• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Mühendislik Fakültesi
  • Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü
  • Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Mühendislik Fakültesi
  • Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü
  • Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Bulanık Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemlerini Kullanarak Sürekli İyileştirme Projelerinin Seçimi ve Önceliklendirilmesi

View/Open
10440495.pdf (1.895Mb)
Date
2022
Author
Durmaz, Çağrı
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-emb
Acik erisim
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item record
Abstract
In order to maintain their existence in the globalizing world and increasingly competitive conditions, businesses need to improve their quality, cost, speed, etc. It has to constantly improve on issues and maintain its position in the market by strengthening it. For this purpose, businesses carry out improvement projects by making use of continuous improvement tools (Lean 6 Sigma, Kaizen, etc.) as they have been for years. However, the resources necessary for the realization of these projects are available. For this reason, it is necessary to select and prioritize projects with high impact levels by considering these resources. In this study, it is aimed to establish a method for the selection and prioritization of continuous improvement projects carried out in a defense industry company. For this purpose, an evaluator committee was formed, and selection and prioritization criteria were determined by taking into account the previous project statements, literature research and company targets for continuous improvement projects. The study was carried out with Analytical Hierarchy Process-AHP, Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process-FAHP, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution -TOPSIS and Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution- FTOPSIS, which are multi-criteria decision making methods, and total scores were calculated for 10 projects taken from different departments in the project evaluation forms prepared. The ranking was made by comparing the projects within themselves according to the scores formed. 4 different methods were compared and combined with the Copeland Method, which is a common ranking methodology, and the final ranking was revealed. Afterwards, the correlation of each method with the integrated ranking was examined. It is aimed to contribute to the literature as the study deals with the evaluation of continuous improvement projects in enterprises with an analytical and logical approach.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11655/26085
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.Collections
  • Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu [53]
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Açık Erişim Birimi
Beytepe Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 297 6585-117 || Sağlık Bilimleri Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 305 1067
Bizi Takip Edebilirsiniz: Facebook | Twitter | Youtube | Instagram
Web sayfası:www.library.hacettepe.edu.tr | E-posta:openaccess@hacettepe.edu.tr
Sayfanın çıktısını almak için lütfen tıklayınız.
Contact Us | Send Feedback



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


DSpace@Hacettepe
huk openaire onayı
by OpenAIRE

About HUAES
Open Access PolicyGuidesSubcriptionsContact

livechat

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_indexFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_indexFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtype

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV