• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Hukuk Fakültesi
  • Özel Hukuk Bölümü
  • Özel Hukuk Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Hukuk Fakültesi
  • Özel Hukuk Bölümü
  • Özel Hukuk Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Kişilik Hakları Bağlamında Boşanma Davalarında İspat

View/Open
Yüksek Lisans Tezi (2.137Mb)
Date
2022
Author
Canıtez Gözübüyük, Bilgenur
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-emb
Acik erisim
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item record
Abstract
Personal rights are an absolute right that an individual possesses which encompasses all the values and personalities of such individual. The rapid development of today's technology has greatly increased the amount and scope of intrusion on different areas of individual private life. With the emergence of different intruding methods, the private life of individual has become more exposed to infiltrations. Divorce cases are closely related to the private and confidential life of an individual, and it is a part of the personal rights of spouses. Hence, it sometimes becomes inevitable for a spouse who is a plaintiff to intrude the rights to privacy of the other. Since the violation of personal rights will constitute a violation of the law as a rule, it is taken that the proof evidence obtained in this way has been obtained by illegal means. According to the Code of Civil Procedure No. 6100 m. 189/II, it is clearly stated that the evidence obtained unlawfully cannot be considered by the court in the proof of a fact. On one hand, there is the right of proof, which is an element of the right to a fair trial and the right to be heard; On the other hand, there is the right of personality. There is no unanimous approach to which of the conflicting values should be given priority. If it is accepted that the right of proof is superior to the right of personality, the use of the right of proof will be considered as a reason for compliance with the law. On the other hand, if personality rights are given priority, the intruding of the spouse, who is in the act of proving, against the personality right of the other will be considered unlawful, and this situation will bring the evaluation of the legality of the evidence to the proceedings.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11655/28573
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.Collections
  • Özel Hukuk Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu [83]
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-citation
Canıtez Gözübüyük Bilgenur, Kişilik Hakları Bağlamında Boşanma Davalarında İspat (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Ankara, 2022.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Açık Erişim Birimi
Beytepe Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 297 6585-117 || Sağlık Bilimleri Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 305 1067
Bizi Takip Edebilirsiniz: Facebook | Twitter | Youtube | Instagram
Web sayfası:www.library.hacettepe.edu.tr | E-posta:openaccess@hacettepe.edu.tr
Sayfanın çıktısını almak için lütfen tıklayınız.
Contact Us | Send Feedback



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


DSpace@Hacettepe
huk openaire onayı
by OpenAIRE

About HUAES
Open Access PolicyGuidesSubcriptionsContact

livechat

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_indexFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_indexFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtype

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV