• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Edebiyat Fakültesi
  • Çağdaş Türk Lehçeleri ve Edebiyatları Bölümü
  • Çağdaş Türk Lehçeleri ve Edebiyatları Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Edebiyat Fakültesi
  • Çağdaş Türk Lehçeleri ve Edebiyatları Bölümü
  • Çağdaş Türk Lehçeleri ve Edebiyatları Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Kıpçak Grubu Türk Dillerinde -GAn Ekiyle Oluşturulan Yan Cümleler

View/Open
Ayşegül Özkan Tez.pdf (1.977Mb)
Date
2023
Author
Özkan, Ayşegül
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-emb
Acik erisim
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item record
Abstract
The Turkic -GAn suffix is seen in a few examples in the Old Turkic period. It has become a multifunctional suffix that can be used in different syntactic environments in later periods. Modern Turkic languages are divided into two groups in terms of the use of suffixes. The first group uses the suffix in more than one syntactic environment. In the Kipchak Turkic, the -GAn suffix functions as a tense-aspect marker. It also functions as a derivational suffix. Its primary function, which is the subject of our study, is to be used as a subordinate clause marker. In Turkic languages, clauses that are syntactically dependent on a matrix clause are coded with certain suffixes. They have internal and external syntactic features. They also have certain semantic features. The study's first aim is to describe these features of the subordinate clauses formed with the suffix -GAn in Kipchak languages synchronically. Within the scope of the study, Kazakh, Karakalpak, Nogai, Kyrgyz, Karay, Karachay-Balkarian, Kumyk, Tatar, and Bashkir is included in the study. On the other hand, the other group, which includes Turkish, uses the suffix in a limited area. This group has different functional equivalents for the suffix. Therefore, the second aspect of our study is to compare the functional equivalents in Kipchak languages and Turkish with morpho-syntactic and semantic features. Thus, we aim to determine the two groups' structural and semantic similarities and differences.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11655/29187
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.Collections
  • Çağdaş Türk Lehçeleri ve Edebiyatları Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu [44]
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Açık Erişim Birimi
Beytepe Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 297 6585-117 || Sağlık Bilimleri Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 305 1067
Bizi Takip Edebilirsiniz: Facebook | Twitter | Youtube | Instagram
Web sayfası:www.library.hacettepe.edu.tr | E-posta:openaccess@hacettepe.edu.tr
Sayfanın çıktısını almak için lütfen tıklayınız.
Contact Us | Send Feedback



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


DSpace@Hacettepe
huk openaire onayı
by OpenAIRE

About HUAES
Open Access PolicyGuidesSubcriptionsContact

livechat

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_indexFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_indexFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtype

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV