Ailelerin Konut ve Çevresel Kalite Memnuniyetine Etki Eden Faktörlerin İncelenmesi
View/ Open
Date
2018Author
Şekeroğlu, Mükerrem Bengü
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item recordAbstract
This research was planned and carried out to determine satisfaction level of
families in housing and its environment, to examine the factors related to their
satisfaction about housing and its environment and to make suggestions for
institutions and organizations to increase satisfaction about houses to be
planned in the future. The universe of the research is formed by families who
live in Çankaya, Yaşamkent ,the districts of Ankara. The sample of the research
consists of 420 individuals selected voluntarily to participate in the study by
stratified sampling method. Survey form was used as data collecting tool in the
research. In the prepared questionnaire, the first part consists of personal
information of the participants, the second part is the properties of existing
residences and the third part includes Housing and Environmental Quality
Satisfaction Scale developed to by the researcher for measure satisfaction of
the residents and environment. The reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.953.
When the factor loadings of three sub-dimensions constituting the scale are
examined, the most important variable in “Physical Satisfaction” sub-dimension
was found as "Size of Kitchen (m2)" with a factor load of 0.85. Approximately
41.9% of the participants in this sub-dimension stated that they were pleased
with the entrance (hall) of their houses. The most important variable in
“Accessibility Satisfaction” sub-dimension was identified as "closeness to health
facilities" with a factor of 0.91. In this sub-dimension, 33.6% of the participants
stated that they were satisfied with closeness of their houses to the city center.
The most important variable in “Environmental Satisfaction” sub-dimension was
determined as "Compliance with fire measures" with a factor of 0.91. In this
subdimension, 35.7% of participants expressed their satisfaction with measures
taken against traffic accidents.
Levels of the subjects’ satisfaction with the houses and their surroundings were
studied in terms of certain socioeconomic and demographic variables, and the
said study did not find reveal any statistically meaningful difference (p>0.05)
between the subjects’ genders, age groups and ownership and the levels of
their satisfaction with physical, environmental and accessibility aspects of the
houses. The difference between their satisfaction levels with the accessibility
and environmental aspects and their income levels was found to be not
meaningful (p>0.05), but the difference between their satisfaction with physical
aspects and their income levels was meaningful (p<0.05). The difference
between levels of their satisfaction with accessibility and their parent or nonparent
status was found to be statistically meaningful (p<0.05), but the
difference between their levels of satisfaction with the physical and
environmental aspects and their same status was found to be not statistically
meaningful (p>0.05). The difference between the surface areas of the subjects’
houses and their levels of satisfaction with the physical, environmental and
accessibility aspects was found to be statistically meaningful (p<0.05).
A statistically significant relationship was found between physical satisfaction
and environmental satisfaction of 57.5%, and it was determined that 45% of the
total change in physical satisfaction can be explained by satisfaction of
environmental satisfaction and accessibility.