• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Edebiyat Fakültesi
  • Felsefe Bölümü
  • Felsefe Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Edebiyat Fakültesi
  • Felsefe Bölümü
  • Felsefe Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Tarihyazımı Tartışmalarının Felsefe Açısından Değerlendirilmesi

Thumbnail
View/Open
son hali.pdf (2.528Mb)
Date
2017-04-17
Author
Ayıtgu, Gülçin
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item record
Abstract
This study aims to examine the changes undergone by the discussions concerning the philosophy of history and historiography in terms of the concepts of “law”, “structure” and “narration”. The idea of a law-centered history tries to give “history” a regular and definite structure by saving it from narrations and stories. In the first part of the thesis, the search for a law in history, which creates the possibility of establishing integrity in history by revealing the possibility of the actualization of events, shall be examined in terms of the concept of history as it is treated by İbni Haldun and G.W.F. Hegel. Both İbni Haldun and Hegel explained the development of history with reference to the recognition and power relations among the states and the people. The criticisms which say that this approach ignored daily life, culture and the relation of history with other disciplines constitute the foundation of the idea of structure-centered history. In this context, in the second part of the thesis, how this “structure” which is formed by the relationship networks would be constructed in an interdisciplinary approach shall be investigated with reference to Fernand Braudel and Marc Bloch. The claim “history represents reality” has become more debatable because of the position of the fictionality in the relation between historiography and historical reality. In this context, in the third part of the thesis, the hypothesis which claims that no matter how much history depends on documents, it has a narrative quality in literary terms is discussed with reference to Hayden White. As a result, in this study, the relation rather than an opposition between the concepts of law, structure and narrative and between different approaches concerning the relation of history and historiography shall be revealed. It is claimed that the limits of history and therefore, historiography could be set forth with the relationality that is tried to be established.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11655/3356
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.Collections
  • Felsefe Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu [81]
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-citation
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Açık Erişim Birimi
Beytepe Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 297 6585-117 || Sağlık Bilimleri Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 305 1067
Bizi Takip Edebilirsiniz: Facebook | Twitter | Youtube | Instagram
Web sayfası:www.library.hacettepe.edu.tr | E-posta:openaccess@hacettepe.edu.tr
Sayfanın çıktısını almak için lütfen tıklayınız.
Contact Us | Send Feedback



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


DSpace@Hacettepe
huk openaire onayı
by OpenAIRE

About HUAES
Open Access PolicyGuidesSubcriptionsContact

livechat

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_indexFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_indexFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtype

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV